Cambios en el tratamiento y disminución de la mortalidad del síndrome aórtico agudo. Lecciones del Registro Español del Síndrome Aórtico Agudo (RESA) / Spanish Registry of Acute Aortic Syndrome (RESA). Changes in therapeutic management and lower mortality in acute aortic syndrome

Introducción y objetivos El Registro Español del Síndrome Aórtico Agudo (RESA) se inició en 2005 para valorar las características del síndrome aórtico agudo (SAA) en nuestro país. El objetivo es analizar las diferencias en las características, el abordaje y el tratamiento y la mortalidad observadas entre las 3 ediciones del RESA. Métodos Se analizaron los datos de los pacientes con SAA incluidos prospectivamente por 24-30 hospitales terciarios en las 3 ediciones: RESA I (2005-2006), RESA II (2012-2013) y RESA III (2018-2019). Resultados Se incluyó a 1.902 pacientes (el 74% varones; media de edad, 60,7± 12,5 años), 1.329 (69,9%) tipo A y 573 (30,1%) tipo B. Comparando los RESAS, la tomografía computarizada aumentó como técnica diagnóstica (el 77,1, el 77,9 y el 84,2% respectivamente; p=0,001). El tratamiento quirúrgico del SAA tipo A aumentó (el 79,6, el 78,7 y el 84,5%; p=0,045) y la mortalidad total disminuyó (el 41,2, el 34,5 y el 31,2%; p=0,002), coincidiendo con una reducción de la mortalidad quirúrgica (el 33,4, el 25,1 y el 23,9%; p=0,003). En el tipo B, el tratamiento endovascular aumentó (el 22,8, el 32,8 y el 38,7%; p=0,006). La mortalidad total del SAA tipo B disminuyó (el 21,6, el 16,1 y el 12,0%; p=0,005) como consecuencia de la reducción de la mortalidad de los tratamientos médico (el 16,8, el 13,8 y el 8,8%; p=0,030) y endovascular (el 27,0, el 18,0 y el 9,2%; p=0,009). Conclusiones El RESA evidencia una disminución de la mortalidad del SAA tipo A coincidiendo con un incremento del tratamiento quirúrgico y una reducción de su mortalidad. En el SAA tipo B, el tratamiento endovascular se asocia con un aumento de la supervivencia, ya que permite una mejor estrategia terapéutica para los pacientes con complicaciones (AU)

Introduction and objectives The Spanish Registry of Acute Aortic Syndrome (RESA) was launched in 2005 to identify the characteristics of acute aortic syndrome (AAS) in Spain. The aim of this study was to analyze the differences in management and mortality in the 3 RESA iterations. Method We analyzed data from patients with AAS prospectively included by 24 to 30 tertiary centers during the 3 iterations of the registry: RESA I (2005-2006), RESA-II (2012-2013), and RESA III (2018-2019). Result AAS was diagnosed in 1902 patients (74% men; age, 60.7±12.5 years): 1329 (69.9%) type A and 573 (30.1%) type B. Comparison of the 3 periods revealed that the use of computed tomography increased as the first diagnostic technique (77.1%, 77.9%, and 84.2%, respectively; P=.001). In type A, surgical management increased (79.6%, 78.7%, and 84.5%; P=.045) and overall mortality decreased (41.2%, 34.5%, and 31.2%; P=.002), due to a reduction in surgical mortality (33.4%, 25.1%, and 23.9%; P=.003). In type B, endovascular treatment increased (22.8%, 32.8%, and 38.7%; P=.006), while medical and surgical treatment decreased. Overall type B mortality also decreased (21.6%, 16.1%, and 12.0%; P=.005) in line with a reduction in mortality with medical (16.8%, 13.8%, and 8.8%, P=.030) and endovascular (27.0%, 18.0%, and 9.2%; P=.009) treatments. Conclusion The iterations of RESA show a decrease in mortality from type A AAS, coinciding with an increase in surgical treatment and a reduction in surgical mortality. In type B, the use of endovascular treatment was associated with improved survival, allowing better management in patients with complications (AU)

Clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing combined heart-kidney transplantation: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to describe clinical characteristics and long-term survival of patients undergoing combined heart-kidney transplant in a single center. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 22 consecutive patients who underwent combined heart-kidney transplant at our institution between 1995 and 2013. Long-term outcomes were analyzed by means of the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Four patients underwent re-do transplant (2 cardiac re-transplants, 1 kidney re-transplant, and 1 combined heart-kidney re-transplant). Most frequent underlying cardiac conditions were coronary artery disease (54%), dilated cardiomyopathy (23%), and chronic rejection of a previous heart graft (18%). Known causes of chronic renal dysfunction were nephroangioesclerosis (23%), drug-related toxicity (14%), and Wegener granulomatosis (5%). Non-specified chronic renal dysfunction was present in 50% patients. In-hospital postoperative mortality rate was 5 of 22 (23%). Causes of early death were directly related to kidney transplant surgery in 4 of 5 (80%) patients. Among the remaining 17 patients who surmounted the postoperative period, long-term survival rates 1 year, 5 years, and 10 years after HKT were 88%, 82%, and 65%, respectively. Over a mean follow-up of 6.7 ± 6.4 years, cumulative incidences of cytomegalovirus infection, coronary allograft vasculopathy, malignancy, and acute cardiac graft rejection were 41%, 6%, 24%, and 41%, respectively. There was no episode of acute renal graft rejection. At the end of follow-up, all survivors (n = 11) were in functional New York Heart Association class I. Mean creatinine serum level was 1.68 mg/dL. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, combined heart-kidney transplant is a feasible therapeutic option that yielded favorable long-term outcomes, with a low cumulative incidence of cardiac graft dysfunction. These results were obtained at the expense of a significant risk of early postoperative mortality, which was mainly related to complications of kidney transplant surgery.

Percutaneous coronary interventions and bypass surgery in patients with cardiac allograft vasculopathy: a single-center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) remains a major impediment to long-term survival after heart transplantation (HT). Limited data exist regarding the impact of coronary revascularization in these patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of revascularization procedures in patients with CAV compared with patients who did not undergo revascularization. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 249 patients who underwent HT at our center between June 1998 and December 2009 and who were examined by coronary angiography after HT. We included patients with moderate or severe CAV according to the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) nomenclature to evaluated outcomes after revascularization or diagnostic angiography. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) comprised death, acute coronary syndrome, coronary revascularization, admission because of heart failure not due to an acute rejection episode, and cardiac retransplantation. RESULTS: Moderate or severe CAV was detected in 43 patients. Twelve (27.9%) underwent coronary revascularization: eight percutaneous interventions and four bypass surgeries. Indications for revascularization were symptomatic ischemia or noninvasive evidence of ischemia (n = 6, 14.0%) or high-risk asymptomatic CAV (n = 6; 14.0%), namely, lesions located in the left main or proximal anterior descending arteries or multivessel disease with left ventricular dysfunction. The remaining 31 (72.1%), who did not undergo revascularization showed an absence of ischemia during exercise echocardiography (n = 11; 25.6%) or diffuse disease not amenable to revascularization (n = 20; 46.5%). During a mean follow-up of 3.0 ± 2.4 years, MACE occurred in three revascularized patients (25.0%), in one with absence of stress-induced ischemia (9.1%) and in 13 with nonrevascularizable disease (65%; P = .012). CONCLUSIONS: Revascularization procedures were effective in HT patients with evidence of ischemia or high-risk CAV. Patients with absence of stress-induced ischemia have a good prognosis without revascularization. On the other hand, diffuse nonrevascularizable CAV is associated with a poor prognosis.